<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular Conservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secularconservative.net/conservative/republicans-as-a-popular-conservative-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/conservative/republicans-as-a-popular-conservative-movement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cephus</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/conservative/republicans-as-a-popular-conservative-movement/#comment-5527</link>
		<dc:creator>Cephus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/?p=414#comment-5527</guid>
		<description>The problem is, Republicans have basically reversed their positions entirely.  They used to be fiscally conservative, small government and low taxes, and on the social side, they were essentially hands-off.  Now, they&#039;re socially conservative, they want to control what everyone does in their bedroom, what people read, what people watch, how people think and they&#039;re essentially hands-off on the fiscal side at best, insane liberal spending machines at worst.  But so long as they keep *CALLING* themselves conservatives, even if they aren&#039;t, they can con a significant portion of the voting conservative public into supporting them because these people are voting for a name, not a position.  Very few people who I would consider classical conservatives would agree with anything that the RNC is doing today, but a lot of them keep voting for them because they can&#039;t tell the difference between the conservatism that was and the neo-conservatism that usurped the name today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is, Republicans have basically reversed their positions entirely.  They used to be fiscally conservative, small government and low taxes, and on the social side, they were essentially hands-off.  Now, they&#8217;re socially conservative, they want to control what everyone does in their bedroom, what people read, what people watch, how people think and they&#8217;re essentially hands-off on the fiscal side at best, insane liberal spending machines at worst.  But so long as they keep *CALLING* themselves conservatives, even if they aren&#8217;t, they can con a significant portion of the voting conservative public into supporting them because these people are voting for a name, not a position.  Very few people who I would consider classical conservatives would agree with anything that the RNC is doing today, but a lot of them keep voting for them because they can&#8217;t tell the difference between the conservatism that was and the neo-conservatism that usurped the name today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
