<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part 1 of 3: Alternative Power Plants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Way to Go Green</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Way to Go Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>Wind Power is very popular around here. There are several large wind farms within 15 miles and several home owners that produce their own wind power. Thanks for writing about this great energy resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind Power is very popular around here. There are several large wind farms within 15 miles and several home owners that produce their own wind power. Thanks for writing about this great energy resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewBoldman</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewBoldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-5378</guid>
		<description>Hi, good post. I have been woondering about this issue,so thanks for posting. I’ll definitely be coming back to your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, good post. I have been woondering about this issue,so thanks for posting. I’ll definitely be coming back to your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janus</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Firstly, by claiming that 1.6% of our power generation comes from petroleum (2007 EIA figures are more up to date and far more flattering to your point -- I&#039;ll use them just to be fair), while technically correct, you ignore the natural gas component which composes another 21.5% of the power generated.  While we can find it independent of crude, natural gas is also a byproduct of crude oil production -- and for the record, we import over 4.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas every year.

Secondly, you are only partly right to question commercial energy production as a major contributor for oil consumption.  If we look solely at petroleum used to generate electricity in commercial power plants, yes, it would seem like we don&#039;t use much oil to meet our energy needs at first glance.  

What you&#039;re forgetting, however, is that if you just look at the fuel sources of commercial electricity generating plants you overlook the vast number of homes that are heated with healing oil, the number of homes that power water heaters and stove-tops with gas, and the vast amount of industry that uses oil to its own furnaces, all of which could be done by substituting electricity for oil products.  LNG makes up 10% of our oil consumption and fuel oil makes up another 20%.  If we were to replace &quot;home burned&quot; oil products with a cheaper commercially generated electric alternative, we could realize a drop in oil imports immediately.

Lastly, part two of this series deals with alternative fuels.  Based on official figures released by the EIA last month, 9,286,000 of the 20,680,000 barrels of petrol per day consumed by Americans is used as gasoline, on top of which an additional 1,622,000 is used as jet fuel.  That means that 52% of all oil used in America is used for transportation.  I would argue that the transportation sector is as great of a concern for US energy policy and that tackling one problem without dealing with the other will never result in energy independence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, by claiming that 1.6% of our power generation comes from petroleum (2007 EIA figures are more up to date and far more flattering to your point &#8212; I&#8217;ll use them just to be fair), while technically correct, you ignore the natural gas component which composes another 21.5% of the power generated.  While we can find it independent of crude, natural gas is also a byproduct of crude oil production &#8212; and for the record, we import over 4.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas every year.</p>
<p>Secondly, you are only partly right to question commercial energy production as a major contributor for oil consumption.  If we look solely at petroleum used to generate electricity in commercial power plants, yes, it would seem like we don&#8217;t use much oil to meet our energy needs at first glance.  </p>
<p>What you&#8217;re forgetting, however, is that if you just look at the fuel sources of commercial electricity generating plants you overlook the vast number of homes that are heated with healing oil, the number of homes that power water heaters and stove-tops with gas, and the vast amount of industry that uses oil to its own furnaces, all of which could be done by substituting electricity for oil products.  LNG makes up 10% of our oil consumption and fuel oil makes up another 20%.  If we were to replace &#8220;home burned&#8221; oil products with a cheaper commercially generated electric alternative, we could realize a drop in oil imports immediately.</p>
<p>Lastly, part two of this series deals with alternative fuels.  Based on official figures released by the EIA last month, 9,286,000 of the 20,680,000 barrels of petrol per day consumed by Americans is used as gasoline, on top of which an additional 1,622,000 is used as jet fuel.  That means that 52% of all oil used in America is used for transportation.  I would argue that the transportation sector is as great of a concern for US energy policy and that tackling one problem without dealing with the other will never result in energy independence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/energy-policy/alternative-power-plants/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s look at what percentage of our power plants are petroleum based in the first place and I argue that the misconception we are having in America is that the foreign oil is going to the electric power utility generation, when only 7% of power generation in the US is petroleum based:

In 2000 Based on primary energy source, coal-fired capacity represented 43 percent (260,990 megawatts) of the Nation&#039;s existing capacity (Figure 1). Gas-fired capacity accounted for 19 percent (117,845 megawatts); nuclear, 14 percent (86,163 megawatts); renewable energy sources, 12 percent (74,575 megawatts); petroleum, 7 percent (41,017 megawatts); and pumped storage hydroelectric, 3 percent (18,020 megawatts).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s look at what percentage of our power plants are petroleum based in the first place and I argue that the misconception we are having in America is that the foreign oil is going to the electric power utility generation, when only 7% of power generation in the US is petroleum based:</p>
<p>In 2000 Based on primary energy source, coal-fired capacity represented 43 percent (260,990 megawatts) of the Nation&#8217;s existing capacity (Figure 1). Gas-fired capacity accounted for 19 percent (117,845 megawatts); nuclear, 14 percent (86,163 megawatts); renewable energy sources, 12 percent (74,575 megawatts); petroleum, 7 percent (41,017 megawatts); and pumped storage hydroelectric, 3 percent (18,020 megawatts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
