[ Content | View menu ]

Failure Is Good

Published by Janus on December 2, 2008

Ask a capitalist why they are a capitalist and one of the first things they’ll tell you is that when you take the risk, you deserve the reward. It’s true. The unspoken corollary to that statement, oft-forgotten, is that risk is an inherent part of entrepreneurship and industry. As a business owner myself, I know from first hand experience just how big of a motivator success can be.

The promise of reward drives us to put in those extra hours. It makes us pay attention to every little detail. It makes us strive for a higher-quality product, a faster product, a more consumer-friendly product, a more convenient product, a cheaper product, a better product. Those rewards make us better leaders. It makes our companies better. It makes our society better.

Conversely, the fear of failure tempers our impulses. When every dollar matters, you stop seeing money as simply a budget and start seeing it as yours. When you pour your blood, sweat, and tears into a business, the loss can be just as devastating as the reward is empowering. That fear, the fear of failure, has an equally powerful – if not more powerful effect on business practices.

The simple fact is that the vast majority of people are so afraid of failure that they don’t even bother to try. Most people can’t bring themselves to take that first step. That fear is potent and fierce. That fear is neither unfounded nor bad. It motivates us.

When you own a small business, you don’t take the corporate jet to a fancy resort half way around the world for a team building exercise. You fly coach, or more likely drive that busted up car with the cracked windshield, half way across the country to make a sales meeting. You don’t hire a secretary when you can answer the phone yourself. You fire employees that don’t perform. You don’t give yourself a hefty Christmas bonus when you have to buy a new piece of equipment. You don’t take a week off when your company is in crisis. When you own the company, you can’t cash out and walk away.

That fear is important. More than anything else, fear makes a businessman truly own a company. Without this ownership, this fear, you’re simply running a company. There is an idle carelessness that creeps in when you don’t have such a deep and personal drive to succeed.

The basic equation of capitalism is with risk comes reward. Without risk, capitalism doesn’t work. We need risk. We need failure. We need to expect failure. We need to accept failure. We need to let failure happen. No, it’s not nice. No, it’s not pretty. No, it’s not easy.

But it’s necessary.

Share this ...
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Fark
  • Twitter

3 Comments

Excellent post, it dovetails into a debate I’ve been having elsewhere in fact. Unfortunately, we get a lot of liberal whack-a-loons who seem to think that everyone deserves a reward whether they take risks or not, they deserve to get the same slice of the pie just for waking up in the morning. I guess that’s enough of a risk these days for some people.

Capitalism and the free market works when we allow it to work. Yes, it can be broken and when we let it run without any regulation whatsoever, as we’ve seen in the financial market recently, it can fall apart entirely, but a rational, well-run, reasonably free market can and does provide sufficient reward to those willing to take risks and it leads to a healthy, growing economy.

We could sure use something like that right now.

 Comment by Cephus on December 2, 2008 @ 9:42 am

(The following is purely musing, I don’t honestly think we could or should do something like this.)

I sometimes wonder if we could find a better method of executive compensation. Something akin to requiring all board-level managers to invest a large portion (half? all?) of their personal finances into a company when assuming the mantle of leadership. Upon their retirement they could withdraw that investment over time, say selling off a percentage of stock at certain benchmark intervals (some on leaving.. some after 3 months.. some after 6.. the rest after a year?). If they needed money while in charge of the company, they could always issue a dividend to all stock holders (themselves included.) To encourage lower-class business managers, we could allow some basic form of compensation, such as maybe 10x the wage of the lowest paid person in the company per anum. That way, if you’re paying your janitors 20k a year, you could still make 200k a year, plus dividends, plus (if you’re a good manager) a windfall stock deal when you leave the company. If you wanted a raise, you could always just better the salary of everyone in the company. There is a semi-precedent for minimum contributions in retirement plans and existing stock incentives for managers. A system like that would be something that runs counter to my free market values, but in a perfect world, maybe with a few tweaks, I think we could make it work.

 Comment by Janus on December 2, 2008 @ 12:32 pm

Actually, I was thinking about this earlier and I think what we need to do is pay CEOs some minimum salary, say $100,000 or something, then tie all of the rest of their compensation to the performance of the company. If the company doesn’t make a profit, they get no more money. This makes the CEO actually care for the welfare of their company, currently most have contracts that give them bonuses even if the company is going bankrupt.

Further, I think their golden parachutes need to be tied to their overall performance while at the company. For every year that the company turns a profit, a certain percentage of that goes into the retirement fund of the CEO. The CEO needs to remain at their post for at least 5 years to be fully invested. That stops the insanity of CEOs leaving their failing companies after 10 days in office with a multi-million dollar bonus.

Not that I think any of this will ever happen but it certainly needs to.

 Comment by Cephus on December 3, 2008 @ 12:47 pm