<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Blog of a Secular Conservative &#187; Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secularconservative.net/tag/gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secularconservative.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 19:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ask Janus: The 14th Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/ask-janus-fourteenth-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/ask-janus-fourteenth-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask Janus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/ask-janus-fourteenth-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my discussion on same sex marriage, someone messaged me and asked why the 14th amendment did not apply.  It is a good question, and one which I will answer in my new segment, “Ask Janus.”  If you have a question you want to ask, leave a comment, drop me an email, or send me an IM.  If the question is relevant enough, I’ll write a response to it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/ask-janus-fourteenth-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 3 of 3: In Defense of Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/in-defense-of-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/in-defense-of-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/in-defense-of-gay-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday California’s Supreme Court, in a 4-3 ruling, decided to actually call gay marriage, marriage instead of some other term that means exactly the same thing.  

Hilarity ensued.

This is part three of three of a series on gay marriage.  In this part I will attempt to lay out exactly why I think same sex marriage should be legal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/in-defense-of-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 2 of 3:  Everybody Panic And Or Celebrate Over Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/everybody-panic-and-or-celebrate-over-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/everybody-panic-and-or-celebrate-over-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/everybody-panic-and-or-celebrate-over-nothing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday California’s Supreme Court, in a 4-3 ruling, decided to actually call gay marriage, marriage instead of some other term that means exactly the same thing.  

Hilarity ensued.

This is part two of three of a series on gay marriage.  In this part I try and fail to figure out why the California decision is such a ground breaking step for same sex couples.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/everybody-panic-and-or-celebrate-over-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 1 of 3: Why States Can Decide Who Gets Married</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/why-states-can-decide-who-gets-married/</link>
		<comments>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/why-states-can-decide-who-gets-married/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/why-states-can-decide-who-gets-married/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday California’s Supreme Court, in a 4-3 ruling, decided to actually call gay marriage, marriage instead of some other term that means exactly the same thing.  

Hilarity ensued.

This is part one of three of a series on gay marriage.  In this part I explore why marriage is even an issue and why states have the right to decide who can and cannot get married.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.secularconservative.net/civil-rights/why-states-can-decide-who-gets-married/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
