This is the third installment of my new weekly news round up column and – not surprisingly – the third week in a row that the health care reform debate and Cheating Charlie Rangel take center stage.

She’ll be confirmed. She’ll be an okay Justice. But I cannot in good conscience support her. It’s a matter of principle.

Has anyone honestly asked themselves if she’s the best qualified person for the job? At this point, does anyone even have the information available to make that kind of judgment? Wouldn’t it be wonderful if there was some kind of process to find these things out? You know, like a hearing or a committee or something?