<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secularconservative.net/the-legislature/opinion-on-sonia-sotomayor-nomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/the-legislature/opinion-on-sonia-sotomayor-nomination/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David SC</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/the-legislature/opinion-on-sonia-sotomayor-nomination/#comment-5683</link>
		<dc:creator>David SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/?p=474#comment-5683</guid>
		<description>Actually, your conclusion may not be that far off.  I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; in the New Republic a while back.  It comes to roughly the same conclusion for slightly different reasons.  Your analysis on the issues has always been spot on in the past and I can&#039;t find any fault in your logic.  I&#039;d be willing to bet you&#039;re right on this one too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, your conclusion may not be that far off.  I read <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085" rel="nofollow">this</a> in the New Republic a while back.  It comes to roughly the same conclusion for slightly different reasons.  Your analysis on the issues has always been spot on in the past and I can&#8217;t find any fault in your logic.  I&#8217;d be willing to bet you&#8217;re right on this one too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Clunn</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/the-legislature/opinion-on-sonia-sotomayor-nomination/#comment-5681</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Clunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/?p=474#comment-5681</guid>
		<description>Nope.  In the end she simply translates to a &quot;She&#039;ll vote left&quot; vote.  She&#039;s not going to be brazen enough to break party lines.  She&#039;ll justify her position after she&#039;s taken it rather then use judgment to arrive at a position.  She&#039;ll be an uneventful flop, and she&#039;ll actually detract from the credibility of any case involving race that she votes on.  I don&#039;t agree with her positions or like her, but she&#039;s a horrible choice in the long run for the political left.  In the end, Obama&#039;s not going to nominate anyone I like more, so why not just accept that she&#039;s what we&#039;re getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  In the end she simply translates to a &#8220;She&#8217;ll vote left&#8221; vote.  She&#8217;s not going to be brazen enough to break party lines.  She&#8217;ll justify her position after she&#8217;s taken it rather then use judgment to arrive at a position.  She&#8217;ll be an uneventful flop, and she&#8217;ll actually detract from the credibility of any case involving race that she votes on.  I don&#8217;t agree with her positions or like her, but she&#8217;s a horrible choice in the long run for the political left.  In the end, Obama&#8217;s not going to nominate anyone I like more, so why not just accept that she&#8217;s what we&#8217;re getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janus</title>
		<link>http://www.secularconservative.net/the-legislature/opinion-on-sonia-sotomayor-nomination/#comment-5680</link>
		<dc:creator>Janus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secularconservative.net/?p=474#comment-5680</guid>
		<description>This is probably one of the strangest and farthest afield of all the conclusions I&#039;ve come to about a political candidate – definitely the strangest I&#039;ve ever put into writing and published for the whole world to see.  I&#039;m not even sure what to make of it myself.  Am I onto something here or am I just completely bonkers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably one of the strangest and farthest afield of all the conclusions I&#8217;ve come to about a political candidate – definitely the strangest I&#8217;ve ever put into writing and published for the whole world to see.  I&#8217;m not even sure what to make of it myself.  Am I onto something here or am I just completely bonkers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
